Retrofitting Existing Foundations for Improved Stability

Retrofitting Existing Foundations for Improved Stability

Overview of Slab Foundations

Retrofitting existing foundations is a critical exercise in ensuring the structural integrity and longevity of buildings. At the heart of this process lies a fundamental step: assessing current foundation conditions to identify weaknesses and risks. This assessment is not merely a preliminary action but a pivotal determinant of the retrofitting strategy's success.


The initial stage of assessing foundation conditions involves a comprehensive evaluation of the existing structural setup, which often begins with historical research. Moisture in a foundation crack encourages mold growth crack in foundation repair bob vila. Understanding the original construction techniques, materials used, and any subsequent modifications or repairs provides invaluable context. This background knowledge helps in pinpointing potential areas of concern that might not be immediately visible.


Physical inspection follows as an indispensable component of this assessment phase. Engineers and inspectors employ various techniques to examine the foundation closely. Visual inspections can reveal obvious signs of distress such as cracks, water damage, or material degradation. However, many issues lurk beneath the surface; thus, advanced diagnostic tools like ground-penetrating radar (GPR) or ultrasonic testing are employed to detect subsurface anomalies without invasive procedures.


One common weakness identified during these assessments is soil instability. The soil's composition and its interaction with moisture significantly impact foundation performance. Loose or expansive soils can lead to settlement or heave, respectively, both of which pose severe risks to structural stability. In such cases, geotechnical investigations become crucial for understanding soil properties and designing appropriate retrofitting solutions.


Another area of concern is material deterioration over time due to environmental factors such as moisture ingress or chemical exposure. Concrete spalling or steel corrosion can severely compromise a foundation's load-bearing capacity. Identifying these weaknesses early allows for targeted repairs using modern materials that offer enhanced durability and resistance.


Seismic vulnerability also constitutes a major risk factor in certain regions prone to earthquakes. Foundations constructed prior to modern seismic standards may lack adequate reinforcement or flexibility required to withstand seismic forces. Through detailed analysis using structural models and simulations, engineers can assess how well an existing foundation might perform under seismic stress and devise necessary strengthening measures accordingly.


Once all potential weaknesses and risks have been identified through meticulous assessment, engineers can develop tailored retrofitting plans aimed at improving stability. These plans often involve reinforcing structural elements with additional supports, underpinning foundations for increased load capacity, or employing advanced technologies like base isolators in seismic zones.


In conclusion, assessing current foundation conditions is an essential precursor to successful retrofitting projects aimed at enhancing stability. By systematically identifying weaknesses and risks through historical research, physical inspections, advanced diagnostics, geotechnical studies, and seismic evaluations-engineers lay the groundwork for implementing effective solutions that ensure buildings stand strong against both present challenges and future uncertainties. This proactive approach not only prolongs structural lifespan but also safeguards occupants by mitigating potential hazards associated with compromised foundations.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Slab Foundations —

Retrofitting foundations is a crucial process in enhancing the stability and longevity of existing structures. As buildings age or face evolving environmental conditions, their foundations might require improvements to uphold safety standards and mitigate risks such as settlement or seismic activity. This essay explores various techniques available for retrofitting foundations, emphasizing their importance in ensuring structural integrity and resilience.


One of the most common methods used in foundation retrofitting is underpinning. Underpinning involves strengthening the foundation by extending its depth or breadth so that it either rests on more supportive soil layers or distributes weight more evenly. Techniques within underpinning include pit underpinning, which entails excavating segments beneath an existing foundation and filling them with concrete to form new support structures. Another variant is piled underpinning, where piles are driven deep into stable soil strata to underpin the building's weight effectively.


Jet grouting presents another innovative technique for retrofitting foundations. This method involves injecting high-pressure jets of grout into the ground to create a solidified mass that enhances soil strength and reduces movement potential.

Retrofitting Existing Foundations for Improved Stability - polyurethane foam

  1. sump pump
  2. uv
  3. tie rods
Jet grouting is particularly effective for improving liquefiable soils in earthquake-prone areas, providing a robust solution without necessitating large-scale excavation.


Micro-piling offers yet another solution, involving small-diameter piles drilled deeply into stable ground. These micro-piles are ideal for situations where access is limited or traditional piling equipment cannot be deployed due to space constraints. Their installation causes minimal vibration, making this technique suitable for sensitive environments or densely built-up urban areas.


For coastal structures or those affected by rising groundwater levels, foundation waterproofing techniques can also play a vital role in retrofitting efforts. This may involve installing drainage systems around the foundation perimeter to redirect water away from the building base or applying waterproof membranes directly onto existing foundations to prevent moisture ingress and subsequent deterioration.


Seismic retrofitting methods are increasingly important as well, especially in regions prone to earthquakes. Base isolation systems can be integrated beneath existing foundations, allowing buildings to move independently from ground motion during seismic events, thus reducing structural stress and potential damage. Shear walls may also be added internally or externally to enhance lateral stability against dynamic forces.


Each of these techniques comes with its own set of advantages and considerations based on cost, effectiveness, site-specific conditions, and environmental impact. The choice of method often depends on factors such as soil type, building design, accessibility issues, and budget constraints.


In conclusion, retrofitting existing foundations is an essential strategy for maintaining structural safety and performance over time. By employing appropriate techniques like underpinning, jet grouting, micro-piling, waterproofing measures, and seismic enhancements such as base isolation systems and shear walls-engineers can significantly improve a building's resilience against both natural challenges like earthquakes and man-made issues related to construction practices or urban development pressures. As infrastructure continues to age worldwide while facing new challenges posed by climate change phenomena like increased flooding risk-it becomes ever more critical that we invest wisely not only in constructing new resilient structures but also in preserving our existing built environment through comprehensive retrofit initiatives focused squarely on foundational stability enhancement strategies suitable across diverse contexts globally today!

Are Slab Foundations More Susceptible to Cracks? What Homeowners Should Know

 Are Slab Foundations More Susceptible to Cracks? What Homeowners Should Know

When it comes to the stability of a home, few issues are as concerning to homeowners as the integrity of their foundation.. Slab foundations, a common choice in many regions due to their cost-effectiveness and quick installation process, unfortunately bring with them certain vulnerabilities.

Posted by on 2024-11-10

Common Foundation Types and How They Affect Crack Repair Costs

 Common Foundation Types and How They Affect Crack Repair Costs

Foundation cracks are a common issue faced by homeowners, and the costs associated with repairing these defects can vary significantly.. Understanding the different types of foundations and how they influence repair expenses is crucial for making informed decisions.

Posted by on 2024-11-10

Overview of Crawl Space Foundations

Retrofitting existing foundations is a crucial process for enhancing the stability and longevity of structures, especially in areas prone to natural disasters or where buildings must meet updated safety standards. The key to successful retrofitting lies in selecting appropriate materials that address specific weaknesses of the existing foundation while also improving overall structural performance. This essay explores the importance of material selection in retrofitting foundations and identifies strategic solutions that can lead to enhanced stability.


The primary challenge in retrofitting existing foundations is to ensure that added materials seamlessly integrate with the original construction, thus reinforcing it without inducing new stresses or failures. This requires an understanding of both the properties of potential retrofitting materials and the characteristics of the original foundation materials. For instance, concrete, a common foundation material, may exhibit issues such as cracking or settling over time. To counteract these problems, materials like fiber-reinforced polymers (FRP) or high-performance concrete can be utilized due to their superior tensile strength and durability.


When selecting materials for retrofit applications, environmental conditions play a significant role. In regions susceptible to seismic activity, for example, flexibility becomes paramount, necessitating materials that can absorb and dissipate energy effectively. Base isolators made from rubber composites are often employed in such scenarios as they allow buildings to move independently from ground motion during an earthquake. Similarly, coastal areas might require corrosion-resistant materials like stainless steel or galvanized components to withstand saline environments.


Sustainability is another critical factor influencing material choice for retrofits today. As environmental awareness grows, there is increasing demand for eco-friendly options that minimize carbon footprint while delivering robust performance. Recycled aggregates and low-carbon cement alternatives offer sustainable solutions without compromising on quality. Moreover, innovative technologies such as self-healing concretes are emerging; these contain microcapsules that release healing agents when cracks occur, automatically repairing damage and extending the lifespan of foundations.


Cost-effectiveness remains a concern for many retrofit projects, particularly those involving large-scale infrastructure upgrades or historical building preservation where budget constraints are prevalent. Henceforth, choosing cost-efficient yet reliable materials becomes essential. Composite materials often provide a balance between affordability and functionality by combining different elements to enhance attributes like strength and moisture resistance without excessive expenditure.


Ultimately, successful material selection hinges on thorough assessment-detailed evaluations encompassing load-bearing capacity requirements alongside environmental considerations ensure optimal choices tailored specifically towards each project's unique challenges and goals.


In conclusion, retrofitting existing foundations offers considerable opportunities for enhancing structural stability through thoughtful material selection strategies customized accordingto local needsand evolving technological advances.. By prioritizing integration compatibility alongside sustainability concerns alongwith practical affordability measures , engineerscan significantly extendthe effective service lifeof aging infrastructure , thereby safeguarding communitiesagainst potentialhazardswhile preservingvaluableheritage sitesfor future generations .

Maintenance Tips for Different Foundation Types

Overview of Crawl Space Foundations

Advantages and Disadvantages of Crawl Space Foundations

Retrofitting existing foundations is a critical engineering task aimed at enhancing the stability and longevity of structures. This process has gained prominence as urban environments grow denser and the demand for sustainable construction practices increases. Retrofitting allows for the strengthening of existing buildings, ensuring they meet modern safety standards without necessitating complete demolition and rebuilding.

Retrofitting Existing Foundations for Improved Stability - sump pumps

  1. polyurea
  2. pin
  3. airlift
By examining successful case studies, we can glean valuable insights into effective strategies and common challenges encountered in this field.


One illustrative case study is the seismic retrofit of a historic building in San Francisco, California. Built in the early 20th century, this structure faced significant risk due to its outdated foundation that was not designed to withstand seismic activity. The retrofit involved underpinning the existing foundation with micropiles-small-diameter piles drilled into stable soil layers beneath soft or liquefiable materials. This technique successfully increased load-bearing capacity and enhanced lateral stability without significantly altering the building's appearance, preserving its historical value while ensuring occupant safety.


Another noteworthy example comes from Rotterdam, Netherlands, where retrofitting efforts focused on addressing ground subsidence issues affecting residential areas built on peat soils. The solution involved installing a series of adjustable steel jacks beneath homes to stabilize them as soil conditions shifted over time. This innovative approach allowed homeowners to periodically adjust their foundations in response to ongoing subsidence, effectively prolonging the lifespan of their properties while mitigating damage risks.


These cases underscore several key lessons for successful retrofits. First and foremost is the importance of thorough site investigation and analysis before commencing any retrofit project. Understanding soil conditions, existing foundation types, and potential environmental impacts are crucial steps that inform suitable intervention methods. Additionally, collaboration among engineers, architects, and local authorities ensures that solutions are not only structurally sound but also sensitive to aesthetic and regulatory considerations.


Moreover, these examples highlight the value of adaptability in design approaches. Retrofit projects often face unique constraints due to existing conditions; thus, flexible methods like micropiling or adjustable supports can be tailored to fit specific needs while minimizing disruption to occupants or surrounding infrastructure.


In conclusion, retrofitting existing foundations for improved stability presents both challenges and opportunities within civil engineering disciplines today. By analyzing successful case studies such as those from San Francisco and Rotterdam-and applying learned principles around site assessment flexibility-engineers can continue developing innovative strategies that reinforce our built environment against natural forces whilst promoting sustainability through resource-efficient practices over traditional reconstruction alternatives.

Overview of Basement Foundations

Retrofitting existing foundations to enhance stability is a crucial endeavor in the realm of structural engineering, particularly for buildings facing the challenges posed by aging infrastructure, evolving safety standards, and environmental changes. However, embarking on such projects requires careful cost considerations and meticulous budget planning to ensure successful execution without financial pitfalls.


At the heart of retrofitting projects lies the need to evaluate the existing foundation's condition thoroughly. This assessment provides insights into the extent of work required and serves as a critical determinant in estimating costs accurately. Engaging experts for detailed inspections can be an upfront expense but is invaluable in avoiding unforeseen complications during construction that could lead to budget overruns.


Once the initial evaluation is complete, developing a comprehensive budget plan becomes paramount. This plan should encompass all anticipated expenses including labor, materials, permits, and potential contingencies. Materials costs often constitute a significant portion of the budget; hence selecting appropriate materials that balance quality with cost-effectiveness is essential.

Retrofitting Existing Foundations for Improved Stability - grouting

  1. grouting
  2. sump pumps
  3. polyurethane foam
For instance, opting for innovative yet affordable reinforcement techniques can result in substantial savings while achieving desired stability improvements.


Labor costs also play a pivotal role in budgeting. It is imperative to allocate funds not only for skilled workers but also for project management personnel who will oversee timelines and expenditures closely. Effective project management ensures that resources are utilized optimally and that any deviations from the original plan are addressed promptly to avoid unnecessary financial strain.


Furthermore, contingency planning cannot be overlooked. Unforeseen issues such as hidden structural weaknesses or unexpected regulatory requirements can arise during retrofitting projects. Allocating a portion of the budget-typically around 10-20%-for such contingencies provides a financial cushion that safeguards against unforeseen disruptions or delays.


In addition to direct costs, considering long-term economic benefits can influence budgetary decisions positively. While initial investments might seem substantial, improved foundation stability often translates into enhanced property value and reduced maintenance costs over time. Articulating these benefits clearly can aid stakeholders in understanding the broader economic rationale behind investing in retrofitting endeavors.


Lastly, securing funding sources early on is crucial to maintaining cash flow throughout the project life cycle. Whether through loans, grants, or partnerships with governmental bodies interested in infrastructure improvement initiatives, having reliable funding channels ensures that work progresses uninterruptedly.


In conclusion, cost considerations and budget planning are foundational pillars upon which successful retrofitting projects rest. By combining thorough assessments with strategic financial management practices-including accurate estimations, resource allocation, contingency planning, and long-term benefit analyses-stakeholders can navigate complex retrofitting challenges effectively while ensuring improved stability for existing foundations within feasible economic parameters.

Advantages and Disadvantages of Basement Foundations

Regulatory compliance and safety standards are critical components in the realm of foundation retrofitting, particularly when aiming to enhance the stability of existing structures. As urban landscapes evolve and environmental challenges become more pronounced, ensuring the integrity of foundational systems is not only a matter of structural necessity but also a legal obligation.


Foundation retrofitting involves modifying or strengthening existing foundations to improve their performance under various loads and conditions. This practice is essential in areas prone to seismic activity, flooding, or other environmental stresses that can undermine structural stability. However, the success of such interventions depends significantly on adherence to established regulatory frameworks and safety standards.


Regulatory compliance ensures that retrofitting projects meet minimum safety requirements set forth by local, national, or international building codes. These regulations are designed to protect both occupants and property by mitigating risks associated with structural failure. Compliance often involves rigorous inspection processes, certification from licensed professionals, and adherence to specified materials and methods deemed safe for particular applications.


Safety standards in foundation retrofitting extend beyond mere compliance; they encompass best practices that have been developed through years of research and field experience. Organizations such as the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) provide guidelines that outline optimal techniques for reinforcing foundations against dynamic forces like earthquakes or prolonged exposure to moisture. These standards help engineers design solutions that not only pass regulatory muster but also maximize long-term durability and performance.


One of the key challenges in adhering to these regulations and standards is balancing cost with compliance. Retrofitting can be an expensive endeavor, particularly if extensive modifications are necessary to meet current codes. Nevertheless, cutting corners on compliance can lead to disastrous consequences, including increased liability for property owners and contractors alike.


Moreover, as climate change continues to alter environmental patterns globally, regulatory bodies continuously update codes and standards to address emerging risks. Staying informed about these changes is crucial for professionals involved in foundation retrofitting projects. It requires ongoing education and collaboration across disciplines-engineers must work closely with geologists, architects, contractors, and policymakers to ensure comprehensive solutions that align with evolving safety expectations.


Ultimately, prioritizing regulatory compliance and safety standards in foundation retrofitting not only safeguards individual buildings but also enhances community resilience against natural disasters. By investing in robust foundational improvements today, we secure safer environments for future generations while demonstrating a commitment to responsible engineering practices.


In conclusion, as we retrofit existing foundations for improved stability amidst changing environmental demands, it is imperative that we uphold stringent regulatory compliance and adhere steadfastly to recognized safety standards. This approach fosters trust among stakeholders-homeowners gain peace of mind knowing their homes are secure; communities benefit from reduced risk; and professionals maintain reputations built on quality craftsmanship guided by sound scientific principles.

As we advance into an era characterized by rapid technological innovation and increased awareness of environmental sustainability, the retrofitting of existing foundations for improved stability becomes an essential focus within the construction industry. This necessity is driven by the dual pressures of aging infrastructure and climate change, which demand that we not only maintain but also enhance the resilience of our built environment.


One of the key future trends in foundation stability is the integration of smart materials and technologies. Smart materials, such as self-healing concrete and shape-memory alloys, have opened new avenues for enhancing structural integrity. These materials can adapt to changing conditions or recover from damage autonomously, thus extending the lifespan of existing structures. For instance, self-healing concrete can seal its own cracks when exposed to water or air, a property that significantly reduces maintenance costs and improves durability.


In addition to material science advancements, sensor technology is revolutionizing how we monitor foundation health. Embedded sensors provide real-time data on structural performance factors such as stress distribution, vibration levels, and moisture content. With this information at hand, engineers can make informed decisions about when and how to intervene in order to prevent failures before they occur. The use of machine learning algorithms further enhances this capability by predicting potential issues based on historical data trends.


Another promising development is the application of geotechnical engineering innovations like soil stabilization techniques. Methods such as jet grouting or deep soil mixing can improve bearing capacity and mitigate risks associated with poor soil conditions without necessitating complete foundation replacement. These techniques are increasingly important in urban areas where space constraints limit traditional excavation methods.


Moreover, modular retrofitting solutions are gaining traction as they offer flexibility and reduced disruption compared to conventional methods. Prefabricated elements can be quickly installed on-site with minimal impact on surrounding structures or activities. This approach not only speeds up the retrofitting process but also aligns with sustainable construction practices by minimizing waste.


Sustainability considerations are indeed becoming central to all aspects of construction, including foundation retrofitting. The reuse and reinforcement of existing foundations reduce the need for new raw materials and minimize environmental impact. Innovations in carbon capture technologies incorporated into building materials also contribute positively by reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with construction activities.


Looking ahead, collaboration between multidisciplinary teams will be crucial for pushing these advancements forward. Architects, engineers, material scientists, and environmental experts must work together to develop integrated solutions that address both current challenges and anticipate future needs.


In conclusion, the future trends in foundation stability are being shaped by cutting-edge technologies that promise not only enhanced safety but also greater sustainability in building practices. Retrofitting existing foundations through smart materials, advanced monitoring systems, innovative geotechnical methods, modular solutions, and sustainable practices offers a proactive approach to improving infrastructure resilience in response to evolving climatic conditions and urban demands. As we continue exploring these possibilities, it is clear that integrating technology into traditional engineering disciplines will redefine how we think about foundational stability for generations to come.

Sealant is a substance used to block the passage of fluids through openings in materials, a type of mechanical seal.In building construction sealant is sometimes synonymous with caulk (especially if acrylic latex or polyurethane based) and also serve the purposes of blocking dust, sound and heat transmission.Sealants may be weak or strong, flexible or rigid, permanent or temporary.Sealants are not adhesives but some have adhesive qualities and are called adhesive-sealants or structural sealants.


Concrete is a material consisting of aggregates joined with a fluid cement which transforms into a solid over time.Concrete is the second-most-used substance in the world after water and is the most extensively used building material.Its utilization in all parts of the world, ton for ton, is twice that of steel, wood, plastics, and aluminium combined.When aggregate is mixed with dry Portland cement and water, the resultant mixture creates a fluid slurry that can be easily poured out and formed into shape.The cement reacts with water using a process known as concrete hydration. This process causes it to harden over several hours to form the hard matrix which binds the components together to form solid stone-like material with a variety of uses.This time allows concrete to be not only formed into forms however, it also allows for various types of tolling processes performed.The process of hydration is exothermic. This means that temperatures in the ambient play a major part in the length of time it takes for concrete to be set.

Concrete is distinct from mortar. It is made of aggregates that are bonded together using bitumen or polymers. Whereas concrete is itself an building material, mortar is a bonding agent that normally connects tiles, bricks as well as other masonry units together.Grout is yet another substance that is connected with concrete and cement.It does not include coarse aggregates. It is either pourable or thixotropic, and is used to fill in gaps between the masonry components or to replace coarse aggregate that has already been put in place.Some methods for concrete manufacturing and repair require pumping grout into the spaces to form a solid mass in situ.

Cement used for construction is generally non-hydraulic, and lime-based. It's either hydro or, more often, non-hydraulic depending on if cement sets when it comes into contact with water.

The term "cement" comes from the Ancient Roman term opus cementicium which was used to describe the construction of masonry, similar to modern concrete comprised of crushed rocks and burnt lime. The process of making cement accounts for about 8 percent of the world's CO2 emissions in the year the year 2018. This includes the heat of the raw materials via fuel combustion in a cement-kiln as well as the release of CO2 stored in calcium carbonate.

The caulking of riveted seams on ships and boilers was achieved by hammering on metal.


Driving Directions in Cook County

Driving Directions From Keen Kutter® to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Blackhawk Supply to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Walgreens to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From 360 CHICAGO to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Willis Tower to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Pullman National Historical Park Visitor Center to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From Pullman National Historical Park Visitor Center to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc
Driving Directions From South Shore Nature Sanctuary to United Structural Systems of Illinois, Inc

Reviews for

KELLY HAYES

(5)

As a licensed property manager who manages townhomes and condos, I have used United Structural on many occasions to correct structural deficiencies. The projects have varied, some have been extremely serious in nature. I have always been extremely happy with the outcome, and United Structural has become my "go to" . Highly recommend!

Paul Gunderlock

(4)

The staff was helpful, very nice and easy to work with and completed the work timely and cleaned up well. Communications faltered a bit at times and there was an email communications glitch which was no fault of anyone, but no big deal and all ended up fine. We sure feel better to have this done and hope that is the end of our structural issues. It does seem like (after talking to several related companies), that it would be great if some of these related companies had a structural engineer on staff vs using on the job expertise gained over years - which is definitely valuable! But leaves a bit of uncertainty - and probably saves money for both sides may be the trade-off? So far, so good though! Thank you.

Chris Abplanalp

(5)

USS did an amazing job on my underpinning on my house, they were also very courteous to the proximity of my property line next to my neighbor. They kept things in order with all the dirt/mud they had to excavate. They were done exactly in the timeframe they indicated, and the contract was very details oriented with drawings of what would be done. Only thing that would have been nice, is they left my concrete a little muddy with boot prints but again, all-in-all a great job

Sarah McNeily

(5)

USS was excellent. They are honest, straightforward, trustworthy, and conscientious. They thoughtfully removed the flowers and flower bulbs to dig where they needed in the yard, replanted said flowers and spread the extra dirt to fill in an area of the yard. We've had other services from different companies and our yard was really a mess after. They kept the job site meticulously clean. The crew was on time and friendly. I'd recommend them any day! Thanks to Jessie and crew.

Jim de Leon

(5)

It was a pleasure to work with Rick and his crew. From the beginning, Rick listened to my concerns and what I wished to accomplish. Out of the 6 contractors that quoted the project, Rick seemed the MOST willing to accommodate my wishes. His pricing was definitely more than fair as well. I had 10 push piers installed to stabilize and lift an addition of my house. The project commenced at the date that Rick had disclosed initially and it was completed within the same time period expected (based on Rick's original assessment). The crew was well informed, courteous, and hard working. They were not loud (even while equipment was being utilized) and were well spoken. My neighbors were very impressed on how polite they were when they entered / exited my property (saying hello or good morning each day when they crossed paths). You can tell they care about the customer concerns. They ensured that the property would be put back as clean as possible by placing MANY sheets of plywood down prior to excavating. They compacted the dirt back in the holes extremely well to avoid large stock piles of soils. All the while, the main office was calling me to discuss updates and expectations of completion. They provided waivers of lien, certificates of insurance, properly acquired permits, and JULIE locates. From a construction background, I can tell you that I did not see any flaws in the way they operated and this an extremely professional company. The pictures attached show the push piers added to the foundation (pictures 1, 2 & 3), the amount of excavation (picture 4), and the restoration after dirt was placed back in the pits and compacted (pictures 5, 6 & 7). Please notice that they also sealed two large cracks and steel plated these cracks from expanding further (which you can see under my sliding glass door). I, as well as my wife, are extremely happy that we chose United Structural Systems for our contractor. I would happily tell any of my friends and family to use this contractor should the opportunity arise!

Frequently Asked Questions

Common methods include underpinning, which involves strengthening the foundation by extending it deeper into stable soil layers; installing helical piers or steel push piers to provide additional support; adding concrete or masonry reinforcements such as grade beams; and using slab jacking techniques like mudjacking or foam injection to lift and stabilize uneven slabs.
Signs that your foundation may need retrofitting include visible cracks in walls or floors, doors and windows that stick or dont close properly, uneven floors, and noticeable settling of the structure. A professional inspection by a structural engineer can provide an accurate assessment.
All foundation types can potentially benefit from retrofitting, but older homes with crawl space foundations or those built on expansive clay soils are often more prone to issues that require stabilization. Homes in earthquake-prone areas with unreinforced masonry foundations also greatly benefit from seismic retrofitting.
The cost is influenced by factors such as the extent of damage, size and type of the foundation, soil conditions, accessibility of the site, chosen stabilization method, and local labor rates. An initial inspection will help determine a more precise estimate based on these variables.